More extracts from The Chronicle Herald, Voice of the People section, Jan 20, 2013 on the subject of small business in NS and the NSLC.
David Beresford-Green, Fall River : NSTC next?
Perhaps one reason for originally
setting up the liquor corporation was to save the poor, ignorant
populace from that pernicious substance called alcohol. But one has
to wonder why there was never any government control over an even
nastier substance called tobacco.
Maybe Darrell Dexter is even now
considering setting up Nova Scotia Tobacco Corporation, with only its
outlets selling the product. I doubt he is, but on that basis
consider the illogicality of the NSLC.
It should not be the government’s
business to sell booze. The NSLC should be privatized and the
province allowed to claw its way into the 21st century.
Kevin MacPherson, Halifax
: Truly,
taxpayers lose
The old Latin expression “in vino
veritas” (in wine there is truth) causes me to write concerning the
great broohaha brewed up by the Nova Scotia Liquor Corporation and
others. The simple truth is that the NSLC is afraid a small dent
might be made in its fiscal bottom line.
I am a senior taxpaying citizen of Nova
Scotia. When I lived in my own home, I made wine as a hobby. Having
moved to an apartment, I no longer have the space to brew my own
“nectar of the gods.” I now rely on a young businessman to make
my wine for me.
It is small businesses and bright young
businessmen and women who are the backbone of economic advances.
These people generate ideas which turn small adventures into
profitable employment for themselves and others. This provides tax
dollars for the government to judiciously use for services to Nova
Scotians.
Should the NSLC fight these small
businessmen in court, it will use taxpayers’ money to pay high-end
lawyers against the minimal funds of the small businessmen. A David
and Goliath struggle which favours the fiscal giant know as the
NSLC.
The losers in this scenario are the
taxpayers of Nova Scotia, for we would discourage other entrepreneurs
from attempting to start small businesses. We would lose more of our
tax base in an already tax-strapped province. And we would lose a
source of excellent wine at an affordable price!
Tim Olive, Dartmouth
: Win-win
scenario
Governments in Nova Scotia continue to
ignore the need to privatize the NSLC. The recent harassment of wine
store businesses is another example of why no government agency can
operate retail businesses as efficiently as the private sector.
Privatization means removal of 90 per
cent of NSLC employees from the tax roll, creation of a new revenue
source through small business taxes, retention of liquor tax revenue
based on distribution of alcohol from a government warehouse to
private-sector businesses, and elimination of all government-owned
and -leased properties related to the NSLC monopoly. In addition, the
private sector would move forward with interprovincial trade and
co-operation in liquor distribution.
What part of the scenario that includes
drastically reduced overhead while retaining tax revenue do civil
servants and politicians not understand? Employees can continue
working in a more realistic private-sector environment and if they
choose not to, opportunities will grow for increased employment of
those looking for work.
Safety, security, age checks for
purchasers or easier access to alcohol are red herrings promoted by
people with a personal interest in continuing NSLC and union
benefits.
Wayne Myers, Dartmouth
: Beating up
little guy
This is another example of the Dexter
NDP government and his minister beating up the little guy. If it was
a larger employer, they would attend a news conference with their
money bag.
The minister should support these small
investors and companies, not have their conflict-of-interest NSLC
beat them up and put jobs on the line — for what? The small amount
of business the NSLC might get?
They should have better things to do
with their high-end, high-priced and highly taxed products than beat
on a few small business outlets and their employees. Oh well, the
minister said it is not a high-priority item on her list — must go
find a mill we can help.
No comments:
Post a Comment